Comments on: Peter Schiff – East Windsor P4

By: philliproemer21

philliproemer21 — Thu, 20 May 2010 09:22:44 +0000

Wow, I just realized that the public education system is practically the very definition of a coercive monopoly. In short, it’s having the ability to set arbitrary production policies and charge arbitrary prices, independent of the market, immune from the laws of supply and demand while being protected from competition by law- Nathaniel Brandon

By: eventuallythetruth

eventuallythetruth — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:10:30 +0000

@hitman40912 Have to laugh. They are like chalk and cheese. It’s amazing how revisiting the past can causes such rose tinted views eh? Thatcher was a cracking PM. Had a war to win an election she would have otherwise lost. 2 recessions and destroyed the UK’s manufacturing base to boot. Throw in Thatcher’s children now of today that grew up in her moral vacuum and we now have the result ‘Broken Britain’ . There’s virtually nothing Peter Advocates that she did.

By: hitman40912

hitman40912 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:40:21 +0000

Every argument Peter makes is logical and makes sense. We need people like him in the UK. Our last free market hero Margaret Thatcher is too old to make a comeback.

By: bi0dude42O

bi0dude42O — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:43:48 +0000

even schools like uc berkeley and ucla were about 7,000 a year until they were raised i think 30% this year. university of california might be a more fair comparison of price.

By: bi0dude42O

bi0dude42O — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:10:57 +0000

@MIT2004 in california colleges named after the city are private. like u of san fran or u of san diego so i thought it was private. i’m sure the schools receive tons of federal subsidies but california spends a fortune on public colleges. it’s one of the reasons we’re broke.